![]() |
Save Our Heritage |
Protecting the Birthplace of the American Revolution, the cradle of the Environmental Movement, and the Home of the American Literary Renaissance |
|
North Airfield Project Library |
Massport's financial and project agreement with proponent |
|
Process milestones for Environmental Review |
|
State mandated requirements for Environmental Impact disclosure for the Jet Hangar project |
|
The detailed proposal to triple the jet hangar capacity at Hanscom Field |
|
The secretive developers and funders of the project, and their relationship to the failed Silicon Valley Bank |
|
Examining Massport's claim that the FAA requires them to build luxury hangars |
|
Massport's latest report on the state of the airport and environmental impacts at Hanscom Field |
|
Massport's 2022 report on flight operations and noise |
|
Massport's 2021 report on flight operations and noise |
|
Massport's 2022 report on the activites at Hanscom |
|
Massport's 2021 report on the activites at Hanscom |
|
The potential for low carbon private luxury jets at Hanscom Field |
|
Different types of ferry flights and how the project might affect them |
|
Explaination of how global warming effects of private jet traffic at Hanscom Field are computed |
|
The official and only policy document of Massport regarding Hanscom Field |
|
Table showing fuel consumption by type of aircraft |
|
The most recent map showing areas of high impact (not made since 2000) |
|
A review of the claims made regarding the economic benefits of Hanscom Field shows that they are overstated |
|
A discussion of the loophole exempting private luxury aviation from sales taxes in Massachusetts |
|
A discussion of the appropriate noise metrics for assessment of impacts at Hanscom Field. |
|
The legislation that took away all the rights of states or airport owners to control aviation noise. |
|
The 1997 Concord warrant article expressing planning objectives for Hanscom Field. Lincoln, Lexington, and Bedford passed nearly identical articles. |
|